The Social Services Department Social Work Essay

Upon the societal services section having the referral from the Youth Justice Service it would be apparent from the information given that Nadia appears to be seting herself at hazard and intercession by services is needed. The local authorization would hold a responsibility to set about an initial appraisal of Nadia ‘s demands which would assist to inform whether Nadia is a kid in demand or a kid in demand of protection. The chief focal point of the appraisal being the safety and well-being of Nadia ( Welsh Assembly Government, 2008 ) . Consultation with the Youth Justice Service and Education will besides assist inform the appraisal along with any other services or persons that are involved giving a holistic overview of the household.

An analysis of the initial appraisal would place the countries risks that Nadia is exposing herself to. Nadia is a adolescent miss who appears to be tie ining herself with work forces known for sexually working immature misss and is known to misapply drugs. With this comes risk around Nadia ‘s physical, mental and sexual wellness. Sexual development can be categorised into being sold, crush, drugged, molested and/ or raped. Young people are enticed into this by money, drugs, intoxicant, age related gifts and the offer of protection and fondness ( Barnardos, 2012 ) . Besides Nadia ‘s inability to recognize the exploitative nature of these relationships and the hazards involved that she may so be unable to give informed consent ( Coles, 2005 ) . This could besides put Nadia at hazard to other immature people as she may utilize coercive behavior to lure others into being exploited. Nadia is reported to be remaining out tardily and appears to hold no regulations or boundaries in topographic point at place, presenting hazard around her safety and her female parent ‘s inability to safeguard her girl. She has disengaged herself from instruction and appears to be a regular non-attender. Nadia is able to pull strings the state of affairs farther by concealing the schools concerns from her female parent. This once more raises issues around her safety as Nadia ‘s female parent believes her to be in school when she is non. Nadia ‘s female parent is reported to hold a little acquisition trouble impacting her cognitive and literacy ability, because of this Nadia appears to hold been able to utilize this to her advantage working her female parent ‘s disablement with respects to her instruction. Nadia might besides be the chief carer of her female parent this may hold been undetected for many old ages, taking to defeat and choler on Nadia ‘s behalf. Besides the degree of her lovingness function and extent of her female parent ‘s demands may put Nadia at hazard as she may be taking on a considerable lovingness function impacting on Nadia ‘s ain physical and mental well-being ( Cleaver, Unell & A ; Aldgate, 2011 ) . There besides appears to be a power instability between Nadia and her female parent, Nadia taking to ignore regulations and boundaries puting herself at hazard and perchance her female parent as a vulnerable grownup. Nadia has late been involved in condemnable activity ensuing in her apprehension and subsequent referral to the Youth Offending Service ( YOS ) . This places Nadia at an increased hazard of going involved in the condemnable justness system impacting on her life opportunities in adolescence/adulthood. Condemnable activity could besides put Nadia at hazard of being detained in a immature wrongdoers unit. Besides increased net incomes from her offenses may increase her drug abuse and her ability to be more accessible to the people who are working her i.e. bus/train menus particularly if she is isolated rurally and recognition on nomadic phone.

In order to turn to these possible hazards in relation to Nadia the societal worker will be required to work with her and in partnership with her female parent to foremost detect why she is exposing such hazard taking behavior and what can be done to decide or understate future hazard. These demands along with working with an stripling will non be straightforward and the worker will about ever be faced with challenges and a reluctance to prosecute. Social work codifications, values and moralss will help and steer the societal worker and besides inform the service user of expected criterions, guaranting that this is done in a non-judgmental, non-oppressive or anti-discriminatory mode ( British Association of Social Workers, 2011, Care Council of Wales 2002, Care Council of Wales 2003 ) . Effective communicating accomplishments are needed in respects to working with striplings and grownups with disablements. Areas to see are linguistic communication used, maintaining dialogue simple and non patronizing the immature individual ( CCW, 2002, 2.2 ) . The societal worker needs to demo regard and value Nadia ‘s sentiments and above all value her as an person ( BASW, 2011, CCW 2002, 1.2 4.1 ) . Work of this nature can non be put into a timeframe unless there is serious hazard of injury and the relationship between the worker and Nadia may take clip to enable her to swear and experience able to lend ( CCW 2003 ) . Consideration may besides be given to how Nadia may desire to be contacted i.e. text messages ( O’Loughlin & A ; O’Loughlin, 2009, Koprowska, 2005 ) .

Associating to the hazards airss by Nadia ‘s behavior the worker would foremost seek and pull off the instance as kid in demand but may necessitate to intensify this to child protection if concerns persist or intensify. Failure to adhere to outlooks of a kid protection program could reason in Nadia being placed in secure adjustment for her ain safety ( Children Act 1989 sec.25 ) .

Referrals would be made to drug and intoxicant services along with turn toing Nadia ‘s sexual wellness demands. Multi-agency working would include coaction with instruction, turn toing Nadia ‘s re-engagement into some signifier of instruction being school or preparation chances and any troubles Nadia is sing. The YOS would turn to Nadia ‘s offending and bar in the hereafter. Possible input from grownup services in respects to her female parent ‘s ain demands, exposure and appraisal of Nadia ‘s demands should she be identified as a immature carer ( Children Act, 2004, Education Act, 2002, Powers of Criminal Courts ( Sentencing ) Act, 2000 & A ; Carers ( Recognition & A ; Services ) Act, 1995 ) . The Police may besides be made cognizant of hazards to Nadia in respects to the sexual development but this may turn out hard if Nadia is unwilling to do a ailment ( Sexual Offences Act, 2003 ) . These intercessions would be monitored and reviewed on a regular basis by kid in demand or nucleus group meetings where the relevant bureaus along with Nadia and her female parent would be required to go to ( Children Act, 2004, WAG, 2008 ) .

The societal worker will be required to turn to the grounds impacting on Nadia ‘s behavior looking at household and environmental factors that possibly act uponing the hazard taking behavior. Scott, ( 2001 ) high spots ancestors in which immature people who are sexually exploited are characterised has holding, these being, dis-engaged from instruction by early teens, drug and intoxicant dependent, history of bolting, dysfunctional household life, low self-pride and societal isolation, Nadia exposing many if non all of these ( Scott, 2001, Coy, 2009 ) .

Prosecuting Nadia in work around these issues will be paramount in enabling the direction of the hazards posed. As discussed the importance of constructing a trusting relationship with Nadia is of extreme importance. The worker may so be able to turn to the issues that are cardinal to Nadia ‘s behavior. Intervention would include concentrating on her self-pride and personal safety recognizing what is hazard taking and protective behaviors. Educating Nadia around healthy/caring and harmful/controlling relationships, definition of consent and her ability to place them in the hereafter. Guidance may besides be needed one time Nadia has recognised the nature and grade of her sexual development ( Barnardos, 2012 ) .

Nadia ‘s female parent appears to be fighting at present in her ability to parent and safeguard her girl. The initial appraisal would hold highlighted any drawn-out household members or close friends that may be able to help her the appraisal would besides turn to the absence of Nadia ‘s male parent and whether he may be a possible protective factor. Nadia ‘s female parent appears to necessitate to recover control and unstill regulations and boundaries for her girl this may turn out hard due to her disablement and possible length of clip it may hold been traveling on. Nadia ‘s female parent needs to take appropriate action when her girl does non return place by the in agreement clip describing her as a losing individual to the Police. Work would be undertaken with Nadia and her female parent together to perchance heighten their relationship and semen to an understanding of regulations, boundaries and effects jointly. Nadia is more likely to hold to this if she feels she has some ownership over it.

Along with the bow mentioned statute law there are services in respects to the Welsh context that would be suited to mention Nadia and her female parent. Barnardos offer two services SERAF ( Sexual Exploitation Risk Assessment Framework ) and besides Rearing Matters. SERAF offers a programme of work with immature people between the ages of 10 and 18 old ages of age who are at hazard of or abused through sexual development ( Barnardos, 2012 ) . Rearing Matters offers parents who are sing trouble support through one to one Sessionss and local parenting groups ( Barnardos, 2012 ) . WAG initiatives besides recognize the troubles experienced by parents, presenting the Positive Parenting Wales cusp ( WAG, 2010 ) .

The All Wales Child Protection Procedures ( WAG, 2008 ) besides recognises the sexual development of kids concentrating on concerns instead than difficult grounds due to the concealed nature of the maltreatment and working in concurrence with Local Safeguarding Boards. There is besides auxiliary counsel to Safeguarding Children: Working Together under the Children Act 2004 issued by the WAG in 2010 in relation to the protection of kids and immature people who are or at hazard of being sexually exploited ( WAG, 2004/2010 ) .

Part Two.

Measuring hazard in societal work in a complex, professional undertaking which requires a scope of accomplishments and opinions.

Hazard can be described as a ‘hazard, or a chance/likelihood of a loss or a peculiar event to happen ‘ ( Collins, 2012 ) , which can look as a great uncertainness in relation to societal work when step ining in people ‘s lives. Over the old ages this has been more formalistic by statistical chance and structured appraisal tools to steer professionals. Hazard across the continuum of societal work can be placed into two general classs, those hazards that people pose to themselves or others and those hazards which people are exposed to ( Kemshall, 2007 ) . Hazard taking and direction demands to be balanced between the uncertainness of unneeded injury and dangers that worker and service user may be exposed to. The right to protection and the right to take hazards necessitate to be exhaustively addressed and considered, this in its ain right will foreground many ethical quandary. Intervention must be justified ; on the other manus society has a responsibility to guarantee kids are non exposed to opprobrious state of affairss. Pull offing hazard should be an chance to besides seek or increase positive results, non merely to avoid danger but to cut down the odds against it ( Calder, 2008 Care Council of Wales, 2002, 4, Corby, 2001 ) .

There appears to be no definite account of hazard or hazard appraisal in societal work and whether it refers to merely negative or harmful results, the balance of good against bad results or whether it even includes the possibility of positive events ( Calder, 2008 ) . Hazard appears to go around around the construct of danger and possible injury and is non merely related to service users but professional and organizational pattern. Measuring hazard requires intervention in household life and the professional demands to be painstaking of how this is managed in respects to how they engage with service users ( Calder, 2008, CCW, 2002, 1-3 ) .

The two chief principals of the Children Act, 1989 are to protect kids from important injury and to guarantee and advance their long term public assistance. The Children Act 1989 introduced the construct of important injury as a threshold for statutory organic structures to step in in household life, advancing the best involvements of the kid. Local Governments have a responsibility to guarantee that kids and immature people are protected from important injury and to safeguard and advance the public assistance of the kid that may necessitate aid and back up beyond that of normal mainstream services ( Scie, 2005 ) . Measuring and safeguarding kids from important injury is a major function in societal work but it can be hard to measure hazard to a high grade of truth as factors are mostly cumulative and research has shown that it can be hard to expect long term results ( Calder, 2008, Scie, 2005 ) . ‘Risk is besides dependent on the state of affairs ; one definition does non suit all ‘ ( Scie, 2005, p21 ) .

Corby, ( 2001 ) suggested that there are three facets to put on the line appraisal in kid protection. These are preventive, fact-finding and continuance hazard appraisal ( Coulshed & A ; Orme, 2006, Kenshall & A ; Pritchard, 2001 ) . Preventive hazard appraisal is considered before any engagement by bureaus takes topographic point and may act upon the determination whether to step in or non. Preventive hazard appraisal is based on declarative factors which inform opinions ( grounds based pattern ) ( Coulshed & A ; Orme, 2006, Webb, 2006 ) . Early work by Browne & A ; Saqi ( 1998 ) cited in Kenshall & A ; Pritchard ( 2001 ) gave indexs of prognostic factors, for illustration: history of household force, history of mental unwellness, drug or intoxicant maltreatment, parent abused or neglected as a kid and research on these affairs will be used to measure the likely cause or result or act upon the manner in which the professional intervenes. A unfavorable judgment of this manner of working is that it can take away from the professional liberty in determination devising. Social workers should take this into history and inform themselves of available grounds as good pattern but should besides be able balance this in each single state of affairs ( Coulshed & A ; Orme, 2006, Kenshall & A ; Pritchard, 2001 ) . This manner of pattern can foreground ethical issues for the worker by agencies of know aparting people because of past events or by factors that are out of their control, the danger is that, for illustration, non-abusers could be identified as maltreaters. Social workers may besides step in when there is no grounds of maltreatment which can be seen as intrusive and demonstrates the importance of equilibrating rights and duties ( Coulshed & A ; Orme, 2006 CCW, 2002, Webb, 2006 ) .

Fact-finding hazard appraisal can besides be known as an initial appraisal and is normally brought to the attending of societal services sections by person who has expressed concerns, this possibly another professional or by a member of the populace. These are normally dealt by working collaboratively with other bureaus in peculiar to child protection and will about ever involve the Police, G.P/Health Visitor and instruction amongst others. The societal worker will be required to utilize the Framework for Assessment which provides a systematic manner of recording and analyzing information about the kid and its household. The worker would besides mention to the All Wales Child Protection Procedures ( WAG, 2008 ) when there are concerns sing kid protection. Troubles can originate when working in a multi-agency partnership as each bureau may hold their ain docket or outlooks of results. This can be apparent when working in instances where domestic force is present and the designation of the hazard that the kids are perchance being exposed to being emotional and physical injury. The Police may be of the sentiment that the kids should be removed from the state of affairs instantly but the societal worker may experience that it is better to work with the female parent and perchance the father/partner in deciding the issues along with guaranting the safety of all concerned. This may be done as a kid in demand or child protection depending on the badness of the maltreatment. Again this demonstrates the complex undertaking by societal workers of equilibrating the hazard against the rights of those involved. Social workers have the responsibility to see the rights of those involved for illustration the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child ( UNCRC, 1989 ) Article 19, provinces that a kid has the right to protection from maltreatment and disregard. Besides Article 8 of The Human Rights Act 1998 states the right to esteem for household life ( Coulshed & A ; Orme, 2006, Cree & A ; Wallace, 2005 ) .

Continuance hazard appraisal may be considered during long term intercessions whereby for illustration, a kid possibly returning to the attention of their parents after a period of separation due to put on the line concerns. Where identifiable hazard has been discovered appraisals need to be made at regular intervals with the focal point being on hazard decrease instead than hazard riddance ( Corby, 1996, Coulshed & A ; Orme, 2006 ) . Continuation hazard appraisal is about equilibrating the hazards of intercession against non-intervention. Evaluation of the original concerns need to be considered and alterations that have occurred acknowledged. The societal worker will so hold to measure whether the alterations made have had a positive or negative influence on the state of affairs or made no difference at all ( Coulshed & A ; Orme, 2006 ) .

In measuring hazard societal workers need to see how power and cognition can act upon determinations that are made. Issues of inequality and disadvantage can lie at the bosom of societal work pattern. The incidence of ‘problems ‘ that are associated with societal work can in itself suggests the possibility of exclusionary and unjust intervention ( Smith, 2010 ) . Professionals have the power to take action to protect others, have the entree and cognition of resources on offer and the cognition of theories which may construe behavior and label persons. Using these to label or pigeonhole an person is in itself an maltreatment of power ( Coulshed & A ; Orme, 2006 ) . Today policy promotes the demand for practicians to be sensitive and informed of the diverseness of people ‘s background, taking into consideration their race, civilization and beliefs. A holistic appraisal of a household should include this as criterion and it is of import to recognize the different attacks and life styles. This should reflect the types of intercession that can be provided for multi-cultural communities ( Coulshed & A ; Orme, 2006, CCW, 2002 1.6, Milner & A ; O’Bryne, 2009, ) .

Serious Case Reviews ( SCRs ) have had a major influence over policy and jurisprudence but unluckily it comes at a monetary value where a kid dies and maltreatment and disregard is a known or suspected factor. SCRs are besides considered when a kid sustains dangerous injury/permanent impairment physical or mental through maltreatment or disregard, earnestly harmed through sexual maltreatment or a violent assault by another kid or grownup ( NSPCC, 2010 ) . The intent of a SCR is to set up if there are lessons to be learned from the manner in which the instance was managed by professionals and administrations and the manner in which they work together to safeguard and advance the public assistance of kids. To besides place what the lessons are and what needs to be changed as a consequence and besides to foreground any betterments with respects to intra and inter-agency working ( WAG, 2007, NSPCC, 2010 ) . The much publicized deceases of Victoria Climbie in 2000 and Peter Connerly in 2007 and the reappraisal by Lord Laming of kid protection processs highlighted the weaknesss of Haringey Local Authority in their attempts to safeguard their most vulnerable kids. Victoria Climbie was exposed to months of disregard and maltreatment by her carers but the cardinal services involved with her and her household, societal services, the Police and wellness failed to recognize the extent to which she was at hazard. Crippling exposed the figure of professional services that Victoria was known to and the fact that they knew as small about her after her decease as they did when she was alive and the failure of the Local Authority to supply good quality services ( Brammer, 2007, Brayne & A ; Carr, 2010 ) . In response to the calamity and Laming review the authorities published Every Child Matters which went onto base on balls the Children Act 2004. The intent of the Children Act, 2004 was to develop more competent and accessible service which focused chiefly around the demands of kids and their households. The cardinal rules of the Act were to guarantee robust spouse working, clearer answerability and better sharing of information ( Brayne & A ; Carr, 2010 ) .

The decease of Peter Connelly three old ages subsequently instructed another SCR on the weaknesss once more of the same local authorization Haringey. The SCR summaries the bureaus engagement with Peter up to his decease. Peter was presented on many occasions with recurrent bruising and hurts that were apparently excused or unexplained by his female parent yet for the bulk of his short life he remained in her attention. At the clip of his decease Peter was noted to hold several hurts including a fracture/dislocation of his spinal column and eight fractured ribs ( Haringey Local Safeguarding Board, 2009 ) . The SCR highlighted weaknesss by the authorization in protecting Peter from hazard. The study concluded that intercessions, lacked urgency, thoroughness, failed to dispute the parent, lacked action, insufficiently focussed on the kid ‘s public assistance, had excessively high a threshold for intercession and had outlooks that were excessively low ( Haringey LSB, 2009 ) . In visible radiation of the findings from the SCR Lord Laming was ordered to reexamine child protection processs and his study was published in 2009. Crippling recommended that there be clear outlooks set out where there are concerns about a kid ‘s safety and that front line squads have equal preparation to cover with referrals. He addressed the importance of high quality, regular supervising for societal worker. Inadequate supervising was highlighted as a lending factor to the hapless pattern that took topographic point in Haringly. Supervision should assist develop the competency and assurance of the professional ( Community Care, 2010, Parrott, 2008 ) . Crippling besides requested that initial appraisals are undertaken in all referrals to kids ‘s service from other professional which involves direct contact with the kid ( Community Care, 2010 ) .

Professor Eileen Munro besides conducted a reappraisal of kid protection in 2011. Munro concluded that, ‘the system has become excessively focussed on conformity with regulations and processs and has lost its focal point on the demands and experiences of kids and immature people ‘ ( NSPCC, 2011 ) . Munro called for more grounds based pattern and stressed the importance of direct work with kids and their households, earlier intercession and maximizing bing resources and the importance of multi-agency working and clear lines of answerability ( NSPCC, 2011 ) .

In relation the Welsh context at that place have been legion SCR held by governments. In the instance of kids ‘C ‘ and ‘D ‘ who had been sexually abused by a kid ‘A ‘ who had been placed by the local authorization at their place when there was clear concern from past histories on kid ‘A ‘ of sexualised behavior. There appeared to be a systematic failure on behalf of societal services and other professional bureaus to go on to integrate this information into transportation sum-ups and chronologies. The section besides failed to utilize the Assessment Framework to garner and update available information about ‘A ‘s behavior which would hold analysed the hazard ‘A ‘ would present if placed with ‘C ‘ and ‘D ‘ . Recommendations from the study stressed that members of staff ‘understand the principals which underpin the Assessment Framework and its relevancy for analysis and appraisal of hazard and likeliness of injury ‘ ( Vale of Glamorgan SCR, 2011, p6 ) . Multi-agency work, staff supervising and preparation were besides highlighted as lending factors ( Vale of Glamorgan, 2011 ) .

Serious Case Reviews are an of import tool for bettering pattern, policy and future acquisition in relation to safeguarding kids. The SCR critically examines pattern within the context of an apprehension of the fortunes in the kid ‘s life that lead to its agony ( HM Government, 2010 )

Although the study did non underscore any issues in relation to the Welshman context there are considerations to be taken into history when apprehension and working with kids and households in Wales. Legislation and counsel i.e. Welsh Language Act ( 1993 ) and the Welsh Language Measure ( 2011 ) and the Care Council for Wales Codes of Practice ( 2002 ) guides societal workers in relation to rights for Welsh talkers and workers should aware of the communicating demands and penchants of service users ( Parris, 2012 ) . Consideration must besides be given to the ruralism in Wales and the impact this may hold on service bringing. Professionals must be sensitive to the scope of civilizations and cultural groups and besides see the demands of kids and households from outside of Wales ( BASW, 2011 Care Council for Wales, 2002 ) .

The National Occupational Standards ( NOS ) supports and underpins the safe pattern of societal work. They set out a description of the function of societal workers and supply a benchmark of ‘best pattern ( Cree & A ; Myers, 2008 ) . In relation to this survey cardinal functions 4 & A ; 5 are relevant, ‘manage hazard to persons, households, carers, communities, ego and co-workers ‘ and ‘manage and be accountable, with supervising and support for your ain societal work pattern within your administration ‘ ( CCW, 2003 4-5 ) . The Care Council of Wales Codes of Practice are professional codifications by which societal work is regulated by. Codes 3 & A ; 4 are peculiarly relevant to this survey in relation to measuring and pull offing hazard. These two codifications focus on the quandary of independency and hazard direction and places a responsibility on the worker to describe troubles originating from resource restraints which can hold a negative impact on hazard direction. The codifications besides ensures that the service user ‘s rights are protected whilst equilibrating hazard and independency. Recognition of the duty on the professional to measure and pull off hazard and to work collaboratively with other bureaus. Professional opinion is needed supported by bureau policy and guidelines ( CCW, 2002, 3-4, Parris, 2012 ) .

In this survey I have shown the complex nature of societal work in relation to a real-life instance survey and to measuring hazard with respects to safeguarding kids. The function and duty of a societal worker in making this is one that comes with a great sense of personal and professional answerability and as discussed determinations or deficiency of intercession can hold serious effects. The survey highlights the importance of societal work values in the function of measuring hazard and how these need to be balanced consequently.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *